Give the verdict before you see the move
Work in a fixed chess order: judge the position, name the feature that matters, then choose the move that fits your verdict. The explanation stays hidden until you commit to all three.
WHITE TO MOVE
How do you evaluate this position?
Check the forcing moves first. Then weigh material, king safety, piece activity and pawn structure before you commit.
Pick a grade on the scale.
What drives the evaluation?
Choose the factor that should lead your verdict.
Which move fits your verdict?
Compare the opponent’s strongest reply to every serious candidate.
Six checks before you choose a move
Start with tactics, finish with comparison. A strategic rule means nothing if the opponent has a forcing answer.
Check captures, checks and direct threats first. A tactical sequence can invalidate a correct-looking strategic story.
Count material, then compare exposed kings, pawn cover and attacking pieces. State whether either factor is temporary.
Compare every piece, fixed pawn weakness, open line, outpost and useful square. Space counts only when it restricts useful moves or supports a break.
Name the opponent's best break, exchange or forcing reply. Do not evaluate only your own plan.
Choose a band, not a magic number. Recording confidence separates a close miss from a confident misconception.
Generate more than one move that serves the plan, compare the best reply to each, then pick. The evaluation rarely dictates one unique move.
The scale, in plain words
Rough pawn values help calibrate: slight means up to about a pawn, clear means one to two pawns' worth, decisive means more. When two grades feel close, ask which factor you would rather own.
Your judgment report
Every completed set updates the report. It stays in this browser; nothing is uploaded.
Where your reads break down
| Theme | Positions | Exact | Factor | Decision | Confident misses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finish the set once to see the breakdown. | |||||
The weakest theme is the one to train next week, not the strongest.