The Elephant Gambit starts with the King’s Pawn Opening (1.e4), and after Black responds with 1…e5, White develops the g1-Knight to f3 (2.Nf3). Then, Black offers a pawn by advancing the d-pawn forward (2…d5). This opening is not considered a reliable gambit because Black typically does not get enough compensation for the lost pawn. The Elephant Gambit is also known as the Queen’s Pawn Countergambit, and occasionally as the Englund Counterattack or Turkish Gambit. In opening databases it is catalogued under the ECO code C40 as part of the King’s Knight Opening.
Its origins are unknown, but there are records showing that players utilized it in the early 1800s. Elephant Gambit is not commonly played at a high level, and White has a higher success score, similar to other gambits.
- Elephant Gambit: Quick Summary (TL;DR)
- Winning percentages on both sides
- Video Tutorial: How to Play the Elephant Gambit
- Why Is It Called the Elephant Gambit?
- Key Ideas Behind the Elephant Gambit
- Playing the Elephant Gambit as Black
- Elephant Gambit’s Theory
- Main Variations at a Glance
- Paulsen Countergambit: 3. Nxe5 line
- Maróczy Gambit: 3. exd5 variation
- 3. d4 line
- How to Counter the Elephant Gambit
- How the Elephant Gambit Compares to Other Offbeat Gambits
- Master games with Elephant Gambit
- 1. Axel Bachmann vs. Shamil Arslanov, 2025
- 2. Vasif Durarbayli vs. Pavel Skatchkov, 2025
- 3. Igor Iagoupov vs. Eray Kilic, 2025
- Pros and Cons
- Elephant Gambit Traps
- №1: The Wasp Variation Trap (a Trap for White)
- №2
- Conclusion
- FAQ’s
- How do you refute Elephant Gambit?
- How do you play Elephant Gambit in chess?
- Is the Elephant Gambit a good opening?
- What is the best response to the Elephant Gambit?
- Is the Elephant Gambit the same as the Englund Gambit?
- What is the ECO code for the Elephant Gambit?
Elephant Gambit: Quick Summary (TL;DR)
- What it is: an aggressive counter-gambit for Black that starts with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5 (ECO code C40), also known as the Queen’s Pawn Countergambit.
- The idea: Black sacrifices the d5-pawn to take White out of preparation, open lines, and attack quickly with the Bishops and Queen.
- Is it good? Objectively no — it is considered unsound. With accurate play White keeps a pawn or a clear edge. But it is a dangerous surprise weapon in blitz and bullet.
- How to counter it (for White): simply accept the gambit. The cleanest path is 3.exd5, after which Black cannot prove enough compensation.
- The main trap: after 3.Nxe5 f6, White wins material with 4.Qh5+. Black, in turn, can trap a greedy White Knight in the Wasp Variation.
Winning percentages on both sides
Master Games Statistics
| Results | Rate |
| Victory for White | 45% |
| Draw | 22% |
| Victory for Black | 33% |
Statistics from 13 Million Amateur Games
| Results | Rate |
| Victory for White | 49% |
| Draw | 4% |
| Victory for Black | 47% |
Video Tutorial: How to Play the Elephant Gambit
Join our growing community on YouTube! Subscribe to the channel and discover all the tips, guides, and strategies. We’re on our way to 200 subscribers.
Video covered the basics, now continue reading to master the deeper lines and hidden Elephant Gambit’s resources.
Why Is It Called the Elephant Gambit?
No one knows for certain who invented the Elephant Gambit or where its name comes from. Records show it being played in casual games as far back as the early 1800s, during the Romantic era of attacking chess. Its main branches were later named after the masters who explored them, the Paulsen Countergambit after Louis Paulsen and the Maróczy Gambit after Géza Maróczy.
The name itself has a few competing explanations. One theory is that the two advanced central pawns resemble an elephant’s tusks. Another points to the fact that, in several languages, the Bishop is historically called the “elephant”, and Black’s quick Bishop development is central to the gambit’s spirit.
Key Ideas Behind the Elephant Gambit
The main goal of the Elephant Gambit is to dislodge White’s minor pieces and expand at the center of the board. To do that, Black sacrifices a pawn to strike with the typical e4-pawn push. White can stay active, utilize their Queen and f3-Knight, and prevail with a material advantage or positional edge. Ne5, d4, and Qe2 are typical moves for White to use the e-file.
Playing the Elephant Gambit as Black
If you want to use the Elephant Gambit as a surprise weapon, treat it the way you would any gambit: forget about the pawn and play for activity. Black’s whole point is to take White out of preparation, so the opening works best in faster time controls where your opponent has to solve problems over the board.
A few practical rules help Black get the most out of it. Develop the Bishops quickly, castle early, and keep the pieces pointed at White’s Kingside and the e4-square. Avoid passive moves like …Be7 that leave you a tempo short. If White plays the critical 3.exd5, the most ambitious try is 3…e4, kicking the f3-Knight and grabbing space before White untangles. The honest truth is that against precise play Black is worse, but in a real game, one inaccurate move from White and the initiative is yours.
Elephant Gambit’s Theory
Main Variations at a Glance
| Variation | Moves | Idea in one line |
|---|---|---|
| Paulsen Countergambit | 3.exd5 e4 | Black kicks the f3-Knight and fights for the center. |
| Maróczy Gambit (Elephant Gambit proper) | 3.exd5 Bd6 | Black develops fast and defends the e5-pawn. |
| Knight Capture | 3.Nxe5 | White grabs the pawn and centralizes the Knight. |
| Wasp Variation | 3.Nxe5 dxe4 4.Bc4 Qg5 | Black counter-attacks g2 and the Knight — full of traps. |
| 3.d4 sideline | 3.d4 | White challenges the center; Black can often equalize. |
Paulsen Countergambit: 3. Nxe5 line
This variation starts after White captures the e5-pawn with the f3-Knight (3.Nxe5). Black has two main responses: 3…Bd6 (attacking the unprotected e5-Knight) and 3…dxe4 (taking the pawn back). Black usually aims to dislodge White’s Knight, and White seeks to attack Black on the Kingside (f7-square is a constant target in many lines).
If Black chooses to play 3…Bd6, White needs to protect the e5-Knight with 4.d4.
Any other attempt, such as 4.Nf3, would give the initiative to Black because it would lose the e4-pawn for White. If Black captures the e5-Knight (4…Bxe5), White will gain the Bishop pair advantage and a significant edge in an endgame. For example, 4…Bxe5, 5.dxe5, and 5…dxe4 (trying to regain the pawn back) would end up with Queen’s traded off (6.Qxd8 and 6…Kxd8) with a superior position for White due to the Bishop pair and uncastled Black King.
Hence, Black usually captures the e4-pawn (4…dxe4). This allows White to develop their pieces rapidly (5.Bc4) to create menace on the f7-square. Black can eliminate the e5-Knight (5…Bxe5), but White doesn’t have to recapture with the pawn and exchange the Queens (this would ruin White’s castling rights). White can play 6.Qh5 and threaten Qxf7 and Qxe5 simultaneously. If Black plays 6…Qe7 (to protect the f7-pawn), White can take on e5 with the Queen (7.Qxe5) and 7…Qxe5 8.dxe5 would transition to a better version of an endgame for White, where they can still castle on the short side and maintain their improvement.
A move like 5…Nh6 would be a bad attempt to protect the f7-pawn because 6.Bxh6 would ruin Black’s Kingside pawn structure.
Most of the variations we discussed lead to an endgame in the 3…Bd6 line. These positions require an understanding of piece placement and positional play in the final pawn structure.
Black can also avoid the endgame and capture the e4-pawn (3…dxe4). White can simplify the position with 4.d4 (4…exd3 and 5.Bxd3 would be a simplified and pleasant position for both sides).
White can also be ambitious and go for the casual 4.Bc4 to oppress the f7-pawn. Here, Black only has one reasonable response to keep the game under control, which is 4…Nh6.
4…Qg5 can be a candidate move to complicate the matters, but after 5.d4 (protecting the e5-Knight) and 5…Qxg2, 6.Bxf7 would ruin Black’s castling rights, and White could play Rf1 without many problems regarding their King’s safety (they would intend to castle long later).
4…Qd4 would also be a similar attempt, and White can capture the f7-pawn with the Bishop (5.Bxf7) and play f4 to guard the Knight (6.f4).
After 4…Nh6 is played (to guard the f7-pawn), White can play 5.d4 to open up the scope of the c1-Bishop (attacking the h6-Knight). Then, the game can transition to an endgame if Black finds the excellent 5…Nd7 resource (a sample continuation can be 6. O-O, 6…Nxe5, 7.dxe5, and Queen trades on the d1-square).
Maróczy Gambit: 3. exd5 variation
This line starts after White captures the d5-pawn with the e-pawn (3.exd5). This variation is objectively better than 3.Nxe5 because White typically wins a pawn on many occasions if they play precisely.
Black usually pushes the e-pawn forward (3…e4) and kicks the f3-Knight away. They can also try to defend the e5-pawn with 3…Bd6. 3…Qxd5 is also a move, which allows White to improve the pieces rapidly after Nc3 with a tempo.
One sample line on 3…e4 could be 4.Qe2 (pinning the pawn), 4…Nf6 (protecting the pawn, it is essential to note that 4…Qxd5 would run into 5.Nc3), 5.d3 (attacking the pinned e4-pawn), 5…Qxd5, 6.Nbd2 (since the d-pawn is pushed, Nc3 would allow Bb4 pin), 6…Nc6, and 7.dxe4. White would be up a pawn in the resulting position, but the f1-Bishop would require the Queen to move (for instance: Qe3 and Bc4 or Bb5 before castling) for the King’s safety on the short side.
In the 3…Qxd5 line, Black would be capturing the pawn back but also allowing 4.Nc3 to come with a tempo. After a move like 4…Qa5 (protecting the e5-pawn and retreating the Queen to a safe spot), 5.Bc4 would be an excellent position for White. White would seek to castle on the short side and bring the f1-Rook to e1, putting pressure on the advanced e5-pawn in the following turns.
In the 3…Bd6 line, White is already up a pawn. They need to eliminate one of the doubled pawns, and 4.d4 is an excellent way of doing it. If 4…exd4 is chosen, White can recapture both ways (5.Qxd4 or 5.Nxd4). Black typically tests White by moving the e-pawn forward (4…e4).
It is important not to play 5.Qe2 because after 5…Nf6, Black can castle in the next move and put the f8-Rook to the e-file. Hence, 5.Nfd2 is a safe spot for the Knight. Then, white would aim for Be2 and short castle to consolidate. Black would seek to strike White’s central majority and aim to push e3 at some point.
3. d4 line
The variation starts after White plays 3.d4 to challenge the center. This move is a sideline of this Gambit because Black can often equalize and avoid losing a pawn.
If Black captures the e4-pawn, White can capture the e5-pawn (3…dxe4) with the f3-Knight (4.Nxe5).
This position would be the same as what we analyzed in the 3.Nxe5 (3.Nxe5 3…dxe4 and 4.d4) variation in the other section. However, the main difference would be that Black cannot capture en-passant with exd3. This improves White’s chances overall.
Black can also capture the d-pawn (3…exd4), and White can take the d4-pawn with the Queen (4.Qxd4). The game can lead to an endgame if Black captures the e-pawn (4…dxe4, 5.Qxd8 and 5…Kxd8). Then, White can play 6.Ng5 with an attacking f7-pawn and e4-pawn simultaneously, winning the e4-pawn back with a slight edge.
Black can also play 4…Nc6 to hit the d4-Queen, which can be answered with 5.Bb5 (pinning the Knight). The Queen trades can again occur similarly to the previous variation, with Bxc6 and Ng5 ideas for White following later.
These positions also tend to lead to an endgame, where Black often ruins their castling rights because the exchanges often occur at the d8-square.
How to Counter the Elephant Gambit
The simplest way to counter the Elephant Gambit is to accept it. Black is hoping White will panic and play passively, but a few accurate moves leave Black down a pawn with little to show for it. The two main refutations are 3.exd5 and 3.Nxe5, and both are good for White.
The cleanest refutation is 3.exd5. After 3…e4 (the Paulsen Countergambit), White does not need to retreat the f3-Knight. Instead, 4.Qe2 pins the e4-pawn against Black’s King. A typical continuation is 4…Nf6 5.d3 Qxd5 6.Nbd2, when Black has no comfortable way to hold the e4-pawn and White stays a pawn up with a healthy position.
If you prefer to keep the pawn structure simple, 3.Nxe5 is also fully sound. The key practical rule for White is the same in every line: develop, target the f7-square, and avoid greedy moves that hand Black the initiative. As long as White returns material only on White’s own terms, Black does not get enough for the sacrificed pawn.
How the Elephant Gambit Compares to Other Offbeat Gambits
The Elephant Gambit belongs to a family of rare, aggressive openings that trade soundness for surprise value. If you enjoy this style, it is worth knowing how it stacks up against its cousins.
| Opening | First moves | Played by | Soundness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant Gambit | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5 | Black | Dubious, but tricky in blitz |
| Stafford Gambit | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 Nc6 | Black | Unsound, but loaded with traps |
| Jerome Gambit | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Bxf7+ | White | Objectively losing, pure surprise |
| Urusov Gambit | 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 | White | The soundest of the group |
| Traxler Counter-Attack | 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.Ng5 Bxf2+ | Black | Sharp and surprisingly resilient |
Compared to these, the Elephant Gambit sits in the middle: less reckless than the Jerome Gambit, but less reliable than the Urusov. Its strength is that it appears as early as move two, so White almost always has to think for themselves straight away.
Master games with Elephant Gambit
1. Axel Bachmann vs. Shamil Arslanov, 2025
2. Vasif Durarbayli vs. Pavel Skatchkov, 2025
3. Igor Iagoupov vs. Eray Kilic, 2025
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| White usually has a material advantage with a proper Elephant Gambit response. | If White doesn’t know the Elephant Gambit counter, the f3-Knight can be misplaced. |
| The endgames are often advantageous for White. | Black can gain central space by advancing the e- and f-pawns forward in many lines. |
| White can decline the complications and still gain a slight edge. | In some cases, Black can exploit White’s lack of development on the Kingside. |
| Objectively, this gambit is not sound. | Black can still fight after they are down a pawn if the Queens are not swapped. |
Elephant Gambit Traps
№1: The Wasp Variation Trap (a Trap for White)
The Elephant Gambit also sets traps in the other direction, so White has to stay alert. After 3.Nxe5 dxe4 4.Bc4, Black can play the tricky 4…Qg5, hitting both the e5-Knight and the g2-pawn at the same time. This is the start of the Wasp Variation.
The greedy 5.Nxf7 looks tempting because it forks the Queen and Rook, but it walks straight into the trap. Black replies 5…Qxg2, attacking the h1-Rook, and after 6.Rf1 Bg4 7.Be2 Bxe2 8.Qxe2 Kxf7 Black simply scoops up the stranded Knight and ends up better. Instead, White should keep things solid, for example the 5.d4 idea shown earlier in the 3.Nxe5 line, and not chase material into Black’s counterplay.
№2
This trap starts with the 3.Nxe5 variation, and Black immediately falls into the trap after they try to kick the e5-Knight with 3…f6. 4.Qh5+ threatens Qf7 in the next turn. Hence, 4…g6 has to be played to block the check. Then, 5.Nxg6 would occur to take advantage of the pin on the h-file. Black has to capture the Knight (5…hxg6) and give up the Rook (6.Qxh8) to avoid getting mated.
Conclusion
The Elephant Gambit starts with Black gambiting a pawn to gain the initiative. It is not considered a sound one because White can easily consolidate and enjoy the extra pawn on many occasions. Black typically tries to expand in the center, but White can reverse the script and control the center if they play precisely. It is not commonly played at the elite level due to its dubious nature.
FAQ’s
How do you refute Elephant Gambit?
To refute the Elephant Gambit, play cautiously and maintain control of the center. Develop your pieces quickly, aiming for a solid position. It’s essential to avoid greedy material grabs that can lead to tactical disadvantages.
How do you play Elephant Gambit in chess?
The Elephant Gambit is initiated after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5. The idea is to challenge White’s center immediately. As Black, you must be prepared for sharp tactics and complex positions, focusing on rapid development and active piece play.
Is the Elephant Gambit a good opening?
The Elephant Gambit is considered unorthodox and risky at high levels of play. It can lead to dynamic, imbalanced positions but is less sound theoretically. It’s more suitable for surprise value and aggressive play in casual games.
What is the best response to the Elephant Gambit?
The best response is to accept the gambit with 3.exd5. After 3…e4 4.Qe2, White keeps the extra pawn and a comfortable position. Capturing with 3.Nxe5 is also good. The key is to develop calmly and avoid greedy moves.
Is the Elephant Gambit the same as the Englund Gambit?
No. They are different openings, even though the Elephant Gambit is sometimes nicknamed the “Englund Counterattack.” The Elephant Gambit starts with 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5, while the Englund Gambit begins with 1.d4 e5.
What is the ECO code for the Elephant Gambit?
The Elephant Gambit is classified under ECO code C40, within the King’s Knight Opening. Its full database name is “King’s Pawn Opening: King’s Knight, Elephant Gambit.”
Jerome Gambit 
Lolli Attack 
Richter-Veresov Attack (Veresov Opening) 
Torre Attack