The Lolli Attack is an aggressive alternative attempt to punish Black in the line reached from Italian Game, 1.e4 (King’s Pawn Opening) e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nxd5?!, by playing the Lolli Attack (also known as the Lolli Gambit) with 6.d4 instead of the bold Fried Liver Attack with 6.Nxf7, where white does not shy away from immediately sacrificing a knight for a quick kill.
The Godfather of this opening is the theoretical Giambattista Lolli, an Italian chess master and theoretician from the 18th century. The general consensus on the opening is that it offers a promising attack and dynamic compensation for white.
- TL;DR – Lolli Attack at a glance
- Winning percentages on both sides
- Video Tutorial: How to Play the Lolli Attack
- Key ideas in Lolli Attack
- Lolli Attack vs Fried Liver Attack: what is the difference?
- How to play the Lolli Attack: theoretical lines
- 6…Be7 (6.d4 Be7 7.Nxf7 Kxf7 8.Qf3+)
- 8…Ke8
- 8…Ke6
- 8….Bf6
- 6…exd4
- 7.0-0
- 7.Qe2
- 6…Nxd4
- 6…Bb4+
- Pros and Cons of Lolli Attack
- The Lolli Attack in practice
- Conclusion
- FAQ’s
- Is the Lolli Attack a good opening?
- Is the Lolli Attack aggressive?
- Is the Lolli Attack a gambit?
- What is the difference between the Lolli Attack and the Fried Liver Attack?
- What is Lolli’s Mate?
- Why is it called the Lolli Attack?
TL;DR – Lolli Attack at a glance
- What it is: an aggressive try against the Two Knights Defense, reached after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nxd5?! 6.d4, a close cousin of the Fried Liver that prepares the f7 sacrifice instead of playing it at once.
- The idea: open the centre with 6.d4, then strike with Nxf7 and Qf3+, dragging the black king into the open while the rook comes to e1.
- Black’s main tries: 6…exd4, 6…Nxd4 and the slow 6…Be7 (or 6…Bb4+). White keeps a clear edge against all of them with accurate play.
- Who should play it: Italian Game players who want to punish 5…Nxd5?! and enjoy sharp, attacking chess. White scores around 57% from this position.
- Lolli or Fried Liver? Same target (f7), different move order: 6.d4 first is more flexible and a great surprise against opponents who only prepared the Fried Liver.
Winning percentages on both sides
| Results | Rate |
| Win for white | 57% |
| Draw | 3% |
| Win for black | 40% |
Video Tutorial: How to Play the Lolli Attack
Join our growing community on YouTube! Subscribe to the channel and discover all the tips, guides, and strategies. We’re on our way to 200 subscribers.
Video covered the basics, now continue reading to master the deeper lines and hidden Lolli Attack’s resources.
Key ideas in Lolli Attack
The Lolli Attack is just as sound and fatal as the Fried Liver Attack and it is tactically justified. In the case of the Lolli Attack, white delays and prepares the thematic knight sacrifice on f7 by attempting to open the central files with 6.d4. The main point behind it is to expose black as much as possible when black’s king is stuck in the center after Nxf7, followed by Qf3+. This aggressive idea sets the board on fire, putting black in a tough spot to defend in a nerve-wracking position, because a slight inaccuracy from black’s side might already turn into a decisive mistake. The mere pressure of having to find the best defensive moves is likely to cause blunders and vision loss.
The position almost never appears in a game between two masters, because top players avoid these lines by not playing the dubious 5…Nxd5?!, but instead preferring 5…Na5. However, it is highly beneficial and significant for Italian Game players to know how to exploit black’s inaccuracy of 5…Nxd5?! in the Two Knights Defense.
Lolli Attack vs Fried Liver Attack: what is the difference?
Both attacks branch off the same position after 5…Nxd5?! and both aim at f7, so they are easy to mix up. The difference is the move order, and that single tempo changes the character of the fight.
The Fried Liver Attack sacrifices immediately with 6.Nxf7, committing white to a forcing attack at once. The Lolli Attack plays 6.d4 first, opening the centre and only then sacrificing on f7, usually with the rook already heading for e1. In short, the Fried Liver is the punch; the Lolli is the same punch thrown after taking one extra step to put the body behind it.
| Lolli Attack (6.d4) | Fried Liver Attack (6.Nxf7) | |
|---|---|---|
| First move | 6.d4 opens lines before sacrificing | 6.Nxf7 sacrifices straight away |
| Type of sacrifice | Pawn now, knight often later (or never) | Knight immediately |
| Character | Flexible, less forcing, more pieces join in | Sharp and forcing from move six |
| Best suited to | Players who like to attack with full development | Players who want an immediate kill |
In practice the Lolli is a dangerous surprise weapon precisely because most club players study the famous Fried Liver and are caught off guard when white delays the sacrifice with 6.d4.
How to play the Lolli Attack: theoretical lines
The Lolli Attack commences with a pawn sacrifice, 6.d4, which can be captured with either 6…Nxd4 or 6…exd4. Slow moves such as 6…Be7 allow white to go all in for a quick death with 7.Nxf7 Kxf7 8.Qf3+, after which the black king either has to move away from the check with 8…Ke8 or 8…Ke6 or block the check with 8…Bf6. All of these options give white a significant edge with accurate play. 6…exd4 blows open the e-file, which white may try to exploit by castling right away with 7.0-0 to bring the rook to e1, whereas the immediate check, 7.Qe2 is not as effective as castling.
6…Be7 (6.d4 Be7 7.Nxf7 Kxf7 8.Qf3+)
Provoking the sacrifice on f7 by playing a move like 6…Be7 is not a good idea for black, as it can backfire quite badly. After the sequence of 7.Nxf7 Kxf7 8.Qf3+, black is faced with a powerful check to deal with.
Two of the legal moves, like 8…Ke8 and 8…Bf6 return the extra material right away, leaving black in a highly unfavorable position out of this situation. 8…Ke6 puts some resistance into defending the d5 knight, but the king in the center is prone to be a constant target.
8…Ke8
Retreating the king back to e8, allows white to capture on d5 with 9.Bd5, threatening Qf7+. At the moment, white is a pawn up, has a promising attack, and black has lost their right to the castle. In other words, black has nothing as compensation but instead has threats to deal with. 9…Rf8, a natural reaction to prevent Qf7+ is met by 10.Bxc6+ bxc6 11.Qh5+ g6 12.Qxh7, winning even more material.
9…Nxd4 is a more clever attempt, because it not only captures a pawn, but also threatens a fork with Nxc2+. White needs to defend the c2 pawn first with 10.Qf7+ Kd7 11.Be4.
Now black is likely to chase the intrusive queen on f7 away with 11…Qf8. But white can just retreat the queen, then chase the knight away and continue attacking. An example line would be: 11…Qf8, making extra luft on d8 for the king as well, 12.Qd5+ Bd6 13.c3 c6 14.Qc4 Ne6 15.0-0 and black will have hard time to coordinate their forces.
8…Ke6
Psychologically, the most intuitive reaction is to put resistance by defending the knight on d5 with 8…Ke6. White is forced to continue with 9.Nc3, otherwise black will consolidate. 9…Nxd4 is no good for black due to 10.Bxd5+ Kd6 11.Qd3 and black remains in a troublesome position, while 9…Nb4 leads to a devastating attack for white. An example variation showing white’s attacking prospects would be 10.0-0 Rf8 11.Qe4 c6 12.a3, chasing the knight away from defending d5, 12…Na6 13.Qxe5+ Kf7 14.Qh5+ Kg8 15.Nxd5 cxd5 16.Bxd5+ Kh8 17.Be4 and black has to give up lot of material to deal with the simple mate threat on h7 with Qxh7#.
8….Bf6
Blocking the check with 8…Bf6 is the most inferior option among the three because it returns the material back without putting any resistance. After 8…Bxf6 9.Bxd5+ black is forced to play 9…Be6, because 9….Ke7 runs into 10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.dxe5 Bxe5 12.Bg5 Bf6 13.Bxf6+ gxf6 14.Nc3 and black king is too exposed with no adequate blocker.
So after 9…Be6, white just clears up the center with few trades, e.g. 10.Bxe6+ Kxe6 11.dxe5 Bxe5 (11…Nxe5 Qxb7) 12.Qh3+ Kf7 13.Qb3+ Kg6 14.0-0 and the black king is completely vulnerable.
6…exd4
6…exd4 is the inferior option among the two possible ways of capturing, because it opens up the e-file. White can exploit black’s development disadvantage by castling swiftly to seize control of the e-file with the rook.
7.0-0
After white castles, it is hard to suggest a good move for black, because a routine move like 7…Be7 is met by the thematic 8.Nxf7. Chess engines might suggest the crazy idea of closing the e-file with a knight sacrifice, e.g. 7…Ne5 8.Re1 Ne3, with the point being, if 9.fxe3, then 9…Nxc4, but it is very unlikely that human players will figure out such idea.
A more natural way that the game might proceed is 7…h6 8.Re1+ Nce7 9.Qh5 g6 10.Qf3, threatening Qxf7+ and hitting d5 at the same time, 10..hxg5 11.Bxd5 Qd6, freeing up the d8 square for the king, 12.Bxf7+ Kd8 13.g3, defending h2. The material may seem equal for the moment being, however, positionally white is just crushing because of the position of black’s king and the discoordination of black’s forces.
7.Qe2
The reason why 7.Qe2 is ineffective is that black can now block the check with 7…Be7 this time, because the thematic sacrifice on f7 occurs with one tempo down for white compared to the line from earler. For example, 8.Nxf7 Kxf7 9.Qf3+ (white has spent tempo playing Qe2 then Qf3+) Ke8 10.Bxd5 Rf8 11.Bxc6+ bxc6 12.Qxc6+ Bd7. Now black is down material but has the initiative and coordinated pieces, while white’s only piece in the game is the queen.
6…Nxd4
The most prudent reaction for black would be to capture on d4 with the knight, without opening the e-file, but also not allowing Qf3+. Therefore, the Nxf7 idea does not work in this variation. White’s only move to maintain the advantage is 7.c3, dislodging the knight. Black cannot retreat the knight, e.g. 7….Ne6 8.Qxd5! Qxd5 9.Bxd5 and the knight on g5 is guarded, 9…Nxg5 10.Bxg5.
Therefore, black has to resort to an ugly looking move like 7…f6, which weakens black’s king position, to be able to play ..Ne6. E.g. 8.0-0 Ne6 (8.cxd4 Bb4+ 9.Bd2 Bxd2+ 10.Nxd2 fxg5 is also good for white) 9.Bxd5 fxg5 10.Qb3 and white keeps the pressure.
6…Bb4+
A rarer way to decline the pawn is the check 6…Bb4+, trying to disturb white before castling. After 7.c3 the bishop must move again, and 7…Be7 simply walks back into the thematic blow: 8.Nxf7 Kxf7 9.Qf3+ Ke6 10.Qe4. Black holds d5 with 10…Bf8, freeing e7 for the knight, but after 11.0-0 white is fully mobilised while black’s pieces are shuffling backwards. The familiar pattern — Nxf7, Qf3+, Qe4 — shows up yet again, which is exactly what makes the Lolli so easy to play once you know the idea.
Pros and Cons of Lolli Attack
| Pros | Cons |
| With an accurate play, white has a crushing attack with active pieces. | Requires calculation skills and technique to convert the attack to a full point. |
| Even if black returns the material, oftentimes it is at the cost of a ruined structure, which white can strategically exploit. | Black may capitalize on the material advantage in the long run, if they may manage to consolidate their position successfully |
The Lolli Attack in practice
You will rarely meet the Lolli in elite play, but it has a sharp practical record everywhere else. Bobby Fischer was happy to wheel it out in simultaneous exhibitions back in 1964, treating 5…Nxd5?! as an invitation rather than a problem to solve. Earlier still, the fifth World Champion Max Euwe showed how to handle the positions when black hands the material back: instead of forcing matters, white can settle for a small but lasting edge, two minor pieces working against a passive rook, and convert it on technique.
The lesson from these games is the one that runs through the whole opening: keep developing as if you had never sacrificed. Not every Lolli ends in mate on h7. Often the reward is simply a safer king, a healthier structure, and pieces that all point at the enemy.
Conclusion
The Lolli Attack is a viable and thrilling alternative to Fried Liver Attack, and a tactically justified attack to attempt punishing black’s early inaccuracy. Because white makes a sacrifice, a precise follow-up is required to finish off the opponent. Therefore, it is highly recommended for Italian players, who are intending to go for the Lolli Attack, to analyze possible responses by black in-depth and up to positions, where substantial advantage for white is already achieved. This will ensure maximum confidence going into the game and add up to the opponents pressure, who will already be having a hard time defending white’s fearless attack.
FAQ’s
Is the Lolli Attack a good opening?
The Lolli Attack can be effective in certain situations, particularly at club and amateur levels. Its strength lies in putting early pressure on Black’s position, especially if Black is unprepared. However, it’s less commonly seen at higher levels of play due to its predictable nature and Black’s ability to counter it with solid defense.
Is the Lolli Attack aggressive?
Yes, the Lolli Attack is considered an aggressive opening. It involves an early pawn sacrifice to gain rapid development and open lines for the pieces, especially the queen and bishops. This aggression aims to unsettle Black’s position and go for a quick attack, often targeting the f7-square.
Is the Lolli Attack a gambit?
It is often called the Lolli Gambit, and the name fits: white gives up at least a pawn with 6.d4 — and frequently a knight on f7 as well — in return for fast development and an attack on the black king. Gambit or attack, the trade is the same: material for initiative.
What is the difference between the Lolli Attack and the Fried Liver Attack?
Both arise after 5…Nxd5?! and both target f7. The Fried Liver sacrifices the knight at once with 6.Nxf7, while the Lolli plays 6.d4 first to open lines and bring the rook into the attack before sacrificing. The Lolli is more flexible and a useful surprise against opponents who have only prepared the Fried Liver.
What is Lolli’s Mate?
Lolli’s Mate is a different idea that happens to share the name: a checkmating pattern with the queen on g7 (or g3) supported by a pawn on f6 (or f3) against a king on g8. It is named after the same theoretician, Giambattista Lolli, but it is a mating motif, not the opening described on this page.
Why is it called the Lolli Attack?
It is named after Giambattista Lolli, an 18th-century Italian master and one of the earliest great chess theoreticians, who analysed these aggressive Italian Game lines.
Accelerated Dragon 
Torre Attack 
Stonewall Attack 
Trompowsky Attack