Sveshnikov Sicilian

The Sveshnikov Sicilian stands out as one of the most unconventional variations within the Sicilian Defense, marked by its distinctive pawn structure. A typical game in the Sveshnikov Sicilian begins with the moves 1.e4 c5 (Sicilian Defense) 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bg5 a6 8.Na3 b5, in which black’s pawns relentlessly chase white’s king’s knight around the board.

Sveshnikov Sicilian

This opening owes its name to the Russian Grandmaster Evgeny Sveshnikov, who left an indelible mark on this opening in the 1970s. The Sveshnikov Sicilian is known for its remarkable dynamism and the deliberate positional imbalances it introduces, a testament to the pragmatic approach of the Soviet School of Chess.

Winning percentages on both sides

Results Rate
Win for white 25%
Draw 58%
Win for black 17%

Key Ideas in Sveshnikov Sicilian

Sveshnikov Sicilian features a central pawn on e5, a departure from the more common Sicilian Variations where white often targets the d4 square for their knight. This e5 advance, however, serves multiple purposes: it seizes space in the center and exerts control over the critical d4 square. Importantly, it also liberates black’s bishop pair, allowing them to participate actively in the game. The potential of this bishop duo becomes fully apparent once black accomplishes their primary objective in this opening: the f5 pawn-break. With this in mind, black focuses on repositioning their pieces on the kingside to launch a potent and aggressive assault.

The Sveshnikov Sicilian further distinguishes itself by incorporating moves like …a6 and …b5 in addition to …d6 and …e5, creating a strikingly unique appearance. These pawn advances might appear provocative and seemingly counter to positional principles, particularly in light of white’s enduring control over the d5 square. However, this also underlines the fact that the nature of this opening is very concrete. The emphasis is placed on the dynamic activity of minor pieces and tactical resources to offset any drawbacks stemming from the pawn expansions.

Sicilian Sveshnikov Theory

Up until the major branching point on move 9, a typical Sicilian Sveshnikov game follows a single line without much of deviation: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bg5 a6 8.Na3 b5 and now black is simply threatening b4, forking white’s knight. The d5 square is very inviting for white’s knight, but it has to be decided whether to occupy it immediately with 9.Nd5 Be7 10.Bxf6 (to eliminate the sole challenger of the d5-knight) 10…Bxf6 or after doubling black’s pawn with 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5. In both cases, white gives up the bishop pair. In the case of the latter, black is likely to get rid of the doubled pawns right away with 10…f5 and undermine white’s center.

9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5

Sveshnikov Sicilian 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5

White’s primary objective is to establish an uncontested knight outpost on d5. To achieve this, the black knight on f6 must be addressed sooner or later. Capturing on f6 before black has a chance to play Be7 results in black doubling the pawns on the f-file. 9.Bxf6 gxf6 (9…Qxf6 would not be possible due to a tactical blow 10.Nd5 Be6 11.Bxb5! axb5 12.Nxb5 and the threat of Nc7+ is not easy to repel. E.g. 12…Qa5+ 13.c3 Rb8 14.b4 and queen has no square to go without being subject to a knight for on c7) 10.Nd5 and black wants to get rid of doubled pawns right away with 10…f5. White can defend the pawn on e4, capture on f5 or just ignore black’s …fxe4. Each of these options presents a unique set of possibilities and deserves closer examination in the context of the game


Sveshnikov Sicilian 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5 11.Bd3

11.Bd3 is not only the most natural response to black’s attempt to undermine white’s center but also the most common move. The move not only develops a piece to a natural square, but white also aims to recapture Bxe4 in case of …fxe4 and the bishop on e4 will pose threats due to discovery attacks (e.g. 11..fxe4?! 12.Bxe4 Bg7?? 13.Nf6+! Qxf6 14.Bxc6+ followed by 15.Bxa8, winning a full rook).

At the same time, white threatens to capture exf5 themselves, so black plays 11…Be6 to prevent that, as 12.exf5?? would leave the knight on d5 hanging, 12…Bxd5. White usually castles, 12.0-0, letting black capture on d5, 12…Bxd5 13.exd5 Ne7.

White ideally prefers the queen to be placed on h5, exploiting the absence of a knight on f6. However, if black gets a chance to play …e4 first, white will be forced to play Be2, blocking the queen’s way to Qh5. So, white creates a luft for the bishop with 14.c3, but also for the knight on a3 to later join the game via c2-e3 or c2-d4 route. 14…Bg7 15.Qh5 e4 16.Be2 0-0 17.Nc2 Kh8 and black wants to slowly expand on the kingside with …f4-…f5, …Ng6 next.


Sveshnikov Sicilian 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5 11. c3

The calm and collected 11.c3 allows black to capture on e4 based on a deep tactical reason. If we consider the line 11..fxe4?! 12.Bxb5! axb5 13.Nxb5, white’s threat of Nbc7+ comes too strong, e.g. 13…Be6 (13…Ra5 14.Nbc7+ Kd7 15.Qg4+! f5 16.Qxf5#) 14.Nbc7+ Kd7 15.Nxa8 Bxd5 (15…Qxa8?? 16.Nb6+ and Nxa8) 16.Qxd5 Qxa8 17.Qf7+ and crushing advantage for white).

The reason why the same idea without c3 would not be as effective lies in the subtle fact that after 11.Bxb5 axb5 12.Nxb5, black has 12…Ra4, threatening ..Rxe4+.

So it becomes clear that 11.c3 deprives the a4 square from the rook, but also …fxe4 opens the diagonal for Qg4+ as seen in the line earlier. Therefore, after 11.c3 black almost always proceeds with 11…Bg7. A standard continuation would be 12.exf5 Bxf5 13.Nc2 (the main purpose behind 11.c3) 13…0-0 14.Nce3 Be6 15.Bd3 f5, and practically, black is in the driver seat thanks to its strong and dynamic center.


Sveshnikov Sicilian 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5 11. exf5 Bxf5

11.exf5 is similar to 11.c3 in many aspects and usually transposes to previously given lines after 11…Bxf5 12.c3 Bg7 13.Nc2 0-0 14.Nce3 Be6 15.Bd3 f5.

White may try to deviate from this variation with 12.Bd3 Be6 13.Be4 Bg7 14.Qh5, but black easily consolidates with 14…Rc8 15.c3 Ne7 and is likely to gain control of the center.


Sveshnikov Sicilian 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5 11. Bxb5

11.Bxb5 is a noteworthy line that follows a forced tactical sequence, as we’ve noted in the chapter regarding 11.c3 above. After, 11..axb5 12.Nxb5 Ra4 13.Nbc7+ Kd7 14.0-0 Rxe4 15.Qh5, hitting both f5 and f7 pawns; 15…Nd4 16.c3 Ne2+ 17.Kh1 and with 17…Kc6!, the only move, black astonishingly manages to escape, exploiting the discoordination of white’s pieces and the lack of bishops to target black’s king. After trading off some more pieces, e.g. 18.c4 Nf4 19.Qd1 Nxd5 20.Nxd5 Kd7, black will get positional superiority due to possession of the bishop pair in an open position.


Sveshnikov Sicilian 9.Nd5

The major alternative to 9.Bxf6 is 9.Nd5, delaying the capture on f6 until black develops to e7. After 9…Be7 10.Bxf6, it will not make sense anymore to recapture with ..gxf6, which would misplace the bishop on e7, therefore, black will retake on f6 with 10…Bxf6.

Compared to the version with a doubled pawn as in the 9.Bxf6 gxf6 line, now black’s plan of f5-break will take more time, which is the main point of playing 9.Nd5. 11.c3, freeing up the c2 square for the knight, 11…0-0 12.Nc2 and white is ready to lauch pawn breaks on the queenside with a2-a4, while black will build up pressure on the kingside. The first step is 12…Bg5, making way for …f7-f5. 13.a4 bxa4 14.Rxa4 a5!, freeing up the rook on a8 from a defensive role but also preventing white’s b2-b4. 15.Bc4 Rb8 16.b3 Kh8, moving out of the diagonal of white’s light square bishop, 17.0-0 and black can finally go for the desired pawn-break 17…f5 18.exf5 Bxf5 19.Nce3 Bg6 with chances for both sides.

Sveshnikov Sicilian Trap

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5. now white threatens to jump on c7 with one of the knight and fork the rook with check, 7…Nxd5 8.exd5 Ne7 9.c4, reinforcing the d5 pawn, 9…a6??, trying to dislodge the knight right away gets black in trouble in the a4-e8 diagonal due to 10.Qa4, not only pinning a-pawn (Qxa8 idea) but also threatening a discovery checkmate after 10…Bd7 11.Nxd6#

Pros and Cons

In most cases, black enjoys the advantage of bishop pair and can use them actively. The absence of pawns to control the d5 square creates a positional vulnerability in the position
Control over the dark color complex in the center and the prospect of a kingside attack starting with the f5 pawn break. Pawns on the queenside as well as the backward pawn on d6 can turn into potential targets


The heart of the Sveshnikov Sicilian is the battle for control over the d5 and e4 squares. Black aims to challenge white’s hold on e4 with the f7-f5 pawn break, while white seeks to secure the d5 square with a knight and supporting pieces. This distinctive pawn structure makes the Sveshnikov Sicilian one of the most strategically and tactically complex openings among the Sicilian Defenses. Due to its versatility and richness, it is a favored choice for black when facing the King’s Pawn opening, offering ample opportunities for creative counterplay.

Written by
Deniz Tasdelen, National Master
National Master with over 20 years of experience. He has participated in many prestigious tournaments, including the European and World Youth Chess Championships.
Ask Question


Is the Sicilian Sveshnikov worked out to a draw?

No, the most recent top games show that Sicilian Sveshnikov still holds potential for rich ideas to be discovered.

How to play Sveshnikov Sicilian as black?

In the Sveshnikov Sicilian, black chases white’s knight with e7-e5, followed by a6-b5 and gains space to place the minor pieces actively. The f5-pawn break is the major theme of the opening.

Share to friends - Your One Stop Chess Resource
error: Content is protected !!