The Elephant Gambit starts with the King’s Pawn Opening (1.e4), and after Black responds with 1…e5, White develops the g1-Knight to f3 (2.Nf3). Then, Black offers a pawn by advancing the d-pawn forward (2…d5). This opening is not considered a reliable gambit because Black typically does not get enough compensation for the lost pawn.
Its origins are unknown, but there are records showing that players utilized it in the early 1800s. Elephant Gambit is not commonly played at a high level, and White has a higher success score, similar to other gambits.
Winning percentages on both sides
Master Games Statistics
| Results | Rate |
| Victory for White | 45% |
| Draw | 22% |
| Victory for Black | 33% |
Statistics from 13 Million Amateur Games
| Results | Rate |
| Victory for White | 49% |
| Draw | 4% |
| Victory for Black | 47% |
Main Ideas
The main goal of the Elephant Gambit is to dislodge White’s minor pieces and expand at the center of the board. To do that, Black sacrifices a pawn to strike with the typical e4-pawn push. White can stay active, utilize their Queen and f3-Knight, and prevail with a material advantage or positional edge. Ne5, d4, and Qe2 are typical moves for White to use the e-file.
Elephant Gambit’s Theory
The 3.Nxe5 line often leads to endgames where Black would be left with ruined castling rights, and White often possesses better piece and pawn coordination.
The 3.exd5 variation typically leads to positions where White is up a pawn but down in development on the Kingside.
Due to Queen’s tendency to trade-off, the 3…d4 variation can transition to other variations and peter out with an endgame.
3. Nxe5 line
This variation starts after White captures the e5-pawn with the f3-Knight (3.Nxe5). Black has two main responses: 3…Bd6 (attacking the unprotected e5-Knight) and 3…dxe4 (taking the pawn back). Black usually aims to dislodge White’s Knight, and White seeks to attack Black on the Kingside (f7-square is a constant target in many lines).
If Black chooses to play 3…Bd6, White needs to protect the e5-Knight with 4.d4.
Any other attempt, such as 4.Nf3, would give the initiative to Black because it would lose the e4-pawn for White. If Black captures the e5-Knight (4…Bxe5), White will gain the Bishop pair advantage and a significant edge in an endgame. For example, 4…Bxe5, 5.dxe5, and 5…dxe4 (trying to regain the pawn back) would end up with Queen’s traded off (6.Qxd8 and 6…Kxd8) with a superior position for White due to the Bishop pair and uncastled Black King.
Hence, Black usually captures the e4-pawn (4…dxe4). This allows White to develop their pieces rapidly (5.Bc4) to create menace on the f7-square. Black can eliminate the e5-Knight (5…Bxe5), but White doesn’t have to recapture with the pawn and exchange the Queens (this would ruin White’s castling rights). White can play 6.Qh5 and threaten Qxf7 and Qxe5 simultaneously. If Black plays 6…Qe7 (to protect the f7-pawn), White can take on e5 with the Queen (7.Qxe5) and 7…Qxe5 8.dxe5 would transition to a better version of an endgame for White, where they can still castle on the short side and maintain their improvement.
A move like 5…Nh6 would be a bad attempt to protect the f7-pawn because 6.Bxh6 would ruin Black’s Kingside pawn structure.
Most of the variations we discussed lead to an endgame in the 3…Bd6 line. These positions require an understanding of piece placement and positional play in the final pawn structure.
Black can also avoid the endgame and capture the e4-pawn (3…dxe4). White can simplify the position with 4.d4 (4…exd3 and 5.Bxd3 would be a simplified and pleasant position for both sides).
White can also be ambitious and go for the casual 4.Bc4 to oppress the f7-pawn. Here, Black only has one reasonable response to keep the game under control, which is 4…Nh6.
4…Qg5 can be a candidate move to complicate the matters, but after 5.d4 (protecting the e5-Knight) and 5…Qxg2, 6.Bxf7 would ruin Black’s castling rights, and White could play Rf1 without many problems regarding their King’s safety (they would intend to castle long later).
4…Qd4 would also be a similar attempt, and White can capture the f7-pawn with the Bishop (5.Bxf7) and play f4 to guard the Knight (6.f4).
After 4…Nh6 is played (to guard the f7-pawn), White can play 5.d4 to open up the scope of the c1-Bishop (attacking the h6-Knight). Then, the game can transition to an endgame if Black finds the excellent 5…Nd7 resource (a sample continuation can be 6. O-O, 6…Nxe5, 7.dxe5, and Queen trades on the d1-square).
3. exd5 variation
This line starts after White captures the d5-pawn with the e-pawn (3.exd5). This variation is objectively better than 3.Nxe5 because White typically wins a pawn on many occasions if they play precisely.
Black usually pushes the e-pawn forward (3…e4) and kicks the f3-Knight away. They can also try to defend the e5-pawn with 3…Bd6. 3…Qxd5 is also a move, which allows White to improve the pieces rapidly after Nc3 with a tempo.
One sample line on 3…e4 could be 4.Qe2 (pinning the pawn), 4…Nf6 (protecting the pawn, it is essential to note that 4…Qxd5 would run into 5.Nc3), 5.d3 (attacking the pinned e4-pawn), 5…Qxd5, 6.Nbd2 (since the d-pawn is pushed, Nc3 would allow Bb4 pin), 6…Nc6, and 7.dxe4. White would be up a pawn in the resulting position, but the f1-Bishop would require the Queen to move (for instance: Qe3 and Bc4 or Bb5 before castling) for the King’s safety on the short side.
In the 3…Qxd5 line, Black would be capturing the pawn back but also allowing 4.Nc3 to come with a tempo. After a move like 4…Qa5 (protecting the e5-pawn and retreating the Queen to a safe spot), 5.Bc4 would be an excellent position for White. White would seek to castle on the short side and bring the f1-Rook to e1, putting pressure on the advanced e5-pawn in the following turns.
In the 3…Bd6 line, White is already up a pawn. They need to eliminate one of the doubled pawns, and 4.d4 is an excellent way of doing it. If 4…exd4 is chosen, White can recapture both ways (5.Qxd4 or 5.Nxd4). Black typically tests White by moving the e-pawn forward (4…e4).
It is important not to play 5.Qe2 because after 5…Nf6, Black can castle in the next move and put the f8-Rook to the e-file. Hence, 5.Nfd2 is a safe spot for the Knight. Then, white would aim for Be2 and short castle to consolidate. Black would seek to strike White’s central majority and aim to push e3 at some point.
3. d4 line
The variation starts after White plays 3.d4 to challenge the center. This move is a sideline of this Gambit because Black can often equalize and avoid losing a pawn.
If Black captures the e4-pawn, White can capture the e5-pawn (3…dxe4) with the f3-Knight (4.Nxe5).
This position would be the same as what we analyzed in the 3.Nxe5 (3.Nxe5 3…dxe4 and 4.d4) variation in the other section. However, the main difference would be that Black cannot capture en-passant with exd3. This improves White’s chances overall.
Black can also capture the d-pawn (3…exd4), and White can take the d4-pawn with the Queen (4.Qxd4). The game can lead to an endgame if Black captures the e-pawn (4…dxe4, 5.Qxd8 and 5…Kxd8). Then, White can play 6.Ng5 with an attacking f7-pawn and e4-pawn simultaneously, winning the e4-pawn back with a slight edge.
Black can also play 4…Nc6 to hit the d4-Queen, which can be answered with 5.Bb5 (pinning the Knight). The Queen trades can again occur similarly to the previous variation, with Bxc6 and Ng5 ideas for White following later.
These positions also tend to lead to an endgame, where Black often ruins their castling rights because the exchanges often occur at the d8-square.
Pros and Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| White usually has a material advantage with a proper Elephant Gambit response. | If White doesn’t know the Elephant Gambit counter, the f3-Knight can be misplaced. |
| The endgames are often advantageous for White. | Black can gain central space by advancing the e- and f-pawns forward in many lines. |
| White can decline the complications and still gain a slight edge. | In some cases, Black can exploit White’s lack of development on the Kingside. |
| Objectively, this gambit is not sound. | Black can still fight after they are down a pawn if the Queens are not swapped. |
Elephant Gambit’s Trap
This trap starts with the 3.Nxe5 variation, and Black immediately falls into the trap after they try to kick the e5-Knight with 3…f6. 4.Qh5+ threatens Qf7 in the next turn. Hence, 4…g6 has to be played to block the check. Then, 5.Nxg6 would occur to take advantage of the pin on the h-file. Black has to capture the Knight (5…hxg6) and give up the Rook (6.Qxh8) to avoid getting mated.
Conclusion
The Elephant Gambit starts with Black gambiting a pawn to gain the initiative. It is not considered a sound one because White can easily consolidate and enjoy the extra pawn on many occasions. Black typically tries to expand in the center, but White can reverse the script and control the center if they play precisely. It is not commonly played at the elite level due to its dubious nature.
FAQ’s
How do you refute Elephant Gambit?
To refute the Elephant Gambit, play cautiously and maintain control of the center. Develop your pieces quickly, aiming for a solid position. It’s essential to avoid greedy material grabs that can lead to tactical disadvantages.
How do you play Elephant Gambit in chess?
The Elephant Gambit is initiated after 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5. The idea is to challenge White’s center immediately. As Black, you must be prepared for sharp tactics and complex positions, focusing on rapid development and active piece play.
Is the Elephant Gambit a good opening?
The Elephant Gambit is considered unorthodox and risky at high levels of play. It can lead to dynamic, imbalanced positions but is less sound theoretically. It’s more suitable for surprise value and aggressive play in casual games.
Jerome Gambit 
Lolli Attack 
Richter Veresov Attack 
Torre Attack